Upload new images. The image library for this site will open in a new window.
Upload new documents. The document library for this site will open in a new window.
Show web part zones on the page. Web parts can be added to display dynamic content such as calendars or photo galleries.
Choose between different arrangements of page sections. Page layouts can be changed even after content has been added.
Move this whole section down, swapping places with the section below it.
Check for and fix problems in the body text. Text pasted in from other sources may contain malformed HTML which the code cleaner will remove.
Accordion feature turned off, click to turn on.
Accordion featurd turned on, click to turn off.
Change the way the image is cropped for this page layout.
Cycle through size options for this image or video.
Align the media panel to the right/left in this section.
Open the image pane in this body section. Click in the image pane to select an image from the image library.
Open the video pane in this body section. Click in the video pane to embed a video. Click ? for step-by-step instructions.
Remove the image from the media panel. This does not delete the image from the library.
Remove the video from the media panel.
Floyd Abrams discusses the First Amendment during the annual Soles Lecture at UD.
When Donald Trump
makes certain statements about Muslims or Mexicans, for example, his
critics may categorize his speech as offensive or divisive, but no one
suggests it is criminal, according to attorney Floyd Abrams.
For that, Abrams told a University of Delaware audience, the United
States can credit the First Amendment to the Constitution a mere 45
words that today show how extraordinarily different we are from other
countries, even other democratic countries, in protecting free speech.
Abrams, a renowned First Amendment lawyer, spoke at UD on Thursday,
Sept. 22, delivering the sixth annual James R. Soles Lecture on the
Constitution and Citizenship.
We have a unique position in the democratic world, Abrams said,
contrasting U.S. free-speech protections with recent cases from other
He offered examples such as a Canadian man who distributed anti-gay
fliers, was charged with a crime because of the offensive wording he
used and had his conviction upheld by higher courts. A very different
outcome occurred in the U.S. when members of the Westboro Baptist Church
demonstrated against gay rights outside funerals of military service
members, in a case that went to the Supreme Court, which upheld the
church members right to protest.
No matter how offensive some speech may be, Abrams said, U.S. courts
have been vigilant in recent decades in protecting First Amendment
He offered other current examples, including British libel law, which
strongly favors the person complaining of libel in contrast to U.S.
law, and Europes right to be forgotten, in which people can require
Google to delete true, public information about them under some
In another case Abrams cited, a citizen in Belgium was convicted of a
crime for distributing printed material advocating anti-immigrant and
anti-Muslim policies. Again, the courts upheld that conviction.
There are very serious policy arguments that can be made for other
routes [regulating speech], such as those in Western Europe, Abrams
noted. His point, he said, is not that other countries are wrong but
that the United States has taken a different route, resulting in its
exceptional position among the worlds democracies.
Abrams also outlined some history of the Bill of Rights, which was
not part of the Constitution when that document was adopted. When the
Constitutional Convention adjourned in 1787, he said, the delegates
agreed on one thing: There would be no Bill of Rights.
Most states and many of the founders believed there was no need to
explicitly list actions the federal government could not take, such as
restricting speech, the press or religion, Abrams said. He quoted
Alexander Hamiltons argument that, The Constitution itself is a Bill
But, for reasons of politics and principle, opinions shifted and the
10 amendments that make up the Bill of Rights were eventually approved
by Congress in 1789 and ratified by the states in 1791.
Today, Abrams said, We would truly be a very different country without the Bill of Rights.
A video of his presentation is available.
Abrams, a senior partner in the New York-based law firm Cahill Gordon
and Reindel, is known for his long career as a tireless free-speech
He told the audience at the 2016 Soles Lecture that he once worked as
a law clerk for a federal judge in Delaware and had considered
remaining in the state to practice. Today, he always tries to accept
invitations to return, he said.
Abrams was once described by the late U.S. Sen. Daniel Patrick
Moynihan as the most significant First Amendment lawyer of our age. He
has litigated some of the most controversial free-speech and free-press
cases of recent times, from the Pentagon Papers to Citizens United,
arguing frequently before the Supreme Court.
His clients have included the McGraw-Hill Cos., Standard & Poors, The New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Time Magazine, Business Week, The Nation and Readers Digest.
Abrams has taught at Columbia School of Journalism and at Yale and Columbia law schools.
The Soles Lecture honors the late James R. Soles, who was a faculty member in the Department of Political Science and International Relations
for more than 34 years. The annual lecture also commemorates the
signing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia on Sept. 17, 1787, and
is generally held on or near that anniversary date.
U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden, a UD alumnus, delivered the
inaugural Soles Lecture in 2011. Other speakers have been U.S. Sens. Tom
Carper and Chris Coons, Delaware Gov. Jack Markell and former Gov. and
U.S. Rep. Michael N. Castle.
Prof. Soles, who died Oct. 29, 2010, received the Universitys
Excellence in Teaching Award twice and its Excellence in Advising Award,
as well as the Universitys Medal of Distinction. He received many
honors and recognitions in his distinguished career, but he is still
best remembered for his personal dedication to teaching and to his
The Soles endowment was established 15 years ago and supports a named
professorship, undergraduate citizenship stipends and graduate
The first stipends were awarded more than 10 years ago, and
recipients have used that support in a wide range of accomplishments. To
see more about recent recipients and the work they have done, visit this site.
Move this whole section up, swapping places with the section above it.